Standardizing the Fight Against Friction
by BRENDAN O'NEILL
February 14, 2008
A new family of films from Pliant aims to standardize the battle against Coefficient of Friction, resulting in more throughput, fewer line stoppages and smoother processing of plastic films
Coefficient of Friction
(CoF) is a significant and constant problem in the world of flexible
packaging. The processing of plastic film causes various conditions on the
surface of the product which can often interfere with the flow of the film
through machines and equipment.
The problem of CoF is one that needs to be addressed
by film manufacturers and converters every day, and maybe the best way to
do so is through the use of additives during the manufacturing of the film.
“One of the main aspects of our business in the
films we make for converters, is controlling the Coefficient of Friction,
which has a lot to do with the charge that plastic films tend to like to
hold onto,” says Randy Scott, vice president of global marketing for
Pliant Corp.
“If the film is left untreated, you get film
that is too attractive. It doesn’t want to flow properly through
equipment; it doesn’t bond properly, etc. The whole reason
we’re in business, in a lot of cases, is to develop film solutions
that incorporate certain additives that help to minimize that
impact.”
Pliant had dealt with this type of problem for years
with regard to its sealant web in a variety of ways, as the company would
customize solutions based on a given customer’s needs and
applications.
“One customer may laminate our sealant web to a
different material than another customer, so we have to account for that.
Their customer may be running a different type of filling equipment
(horizontal f-f-s vs. vertical), so we account for that. There may be
issues with laminations; the film may run fine as a stand-alone film but if
run as a lamination there may be bonding problems or issues with ink
retention,” says Scott.
“We’ve got dozens if not hundreds of
different formulas, and sometimes a number of different products for a
given customer – depending on what they’re doing. But quite
often it’s hit or miss. You can’t account for
everything,” he says.
Pliant’s mission statement with regard to this
challenge was to find the best way to control CoF so that a direct user,
and ultimately the end-user, receives a good product that works
consistently, yields maximum output and minimizes problems like line
stoppages.
The company’s goal was further complicated when
considering environmental concerns such as humidity (especially in summer
vs. winter and how that impacts the surface) and the age of the product,
which can cause major problems. Pliant’s film may test perfectly when
it’s “fresh,” but after sitting in a warehousing
environment for a few weeks, months, etc. it may not have the same
capabilities.
Creating a Standard
“We clearly saw an unmet need in the marketplace
for something that was more consistent and less reliant in a given set of
environmental circumstances, where we could come out with something more
‘standard’ for the marketplace,” says Scott.
Whereas, the traditional additive utilizes a slip
agent called an erucamide used to varying degrees, Pliant worked with one
of its key partners to develop a non-erucamide proprietary system.
The system (including a family of films featuring the
new additive) was launched in late 2007 after much internal work by Pliant
and its vendor partner, and based on the positive feedback, the company is
now ready to introduce it to the marketplace.
Called the GlideFast family of films, Pliant is
excited about this new product and the early returns point to great
results.
“We thought GlideFast was a good name because at
the end of the day, it’s all about throughput,” says Scott.
“We think that customers, after they use it for a while,
they’ll feel it just glides over their lines and runs very fast.
Based on the data we’ve seen, we think it’s going to really
overcome a lot of the variables that we’ve had to contend with.
What we’ve seen so far is that GlideFast
significantly reduces the impact of aging and the impact of different types
of filling equipment. Some customers may have to tweak some of their
adhesives systems, because they’ve never seen anything like this
before, but most have had zero problems. It’s a drop-in system and
people are already seeing the advantages.”
|